-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Benchmarks for paper #588
Benchmarks for paper #588
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like there are a few test failures. @olynch, can you fix them so we can get these performance improvements merged?
750e6ec
to
847a5d4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Owen for this painstaking work on benchmarks!
Two important things should be resolved before merging:
- It looks like lots of new functions don't have unit tests. See inline comments for some of them.
- The use of
@inline
s seems a bit arbitrary, although I could be missing something. In my experience, inlines are only needed to ensure constant propagation for symbols. Can we be more consistent about the use of inlines and remove any extraneous ones?
ab214bc
to
c0d4474
Compare
c0d4474
to
a0d3bc7
Compare
a0d3bc7
to
c526f13
Compare
This contains updated benchmarks, along with code to generate figures for the paper. It also has a lot of miscellaneous optimizations; before this gets merged, I will look back and describe them.